On 10/04/2010 10:50 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2010/10/4 Martin Stransky<stransky@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 10/04/2010 10:24 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >>> Anyway, the situation is worser then people believe, because no matter >>> how many maintainers MoFo apps have in Fedora - they just can't fix >>> bugs and close tickets, even ones with clean and sane patches >>> attached. >> >> Unfortunately you forget to attach the bugs here. We're taking fixes for >> arches to Fedora package, there are s390 fixes in Fedora for instance. > > No, I wasn't forget - I just gave up to get any feedback from you on > these two issues: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/513743 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/578892 > > In fact I do got a feedback from you on the first one - you closed it > as "FIXED UPSTREAM" which was absolutely unacceptable because this > issue still wasn't fixed. So I reopened it with little hope that > someone will apply the attached patch. Unfortunately even this simple > issue was closed automatically with next Fedora release. > > I also cloned this ticket for F-12 (see next ticket) because it is > also affected and don't see any feedback at all. FIXED UPSTREAM is a correct resolution for the bug, and it has been fixed by upstream and came to F13 in firefox 3.6.x. Sorry but we can't fix everything in the current line. There's just disagreement about priorities between us. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
