2010/10/4 Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 10/04/2010 10:24 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> Anyway, the situation is worser then people believe, because no matter >> how many maintainers MoFo apps have in Fedora - they just can't fix >> bugs and close tickets, even ones with clean and sane patches >> attached. > > Unfortunately you forget to attach the bugs here. We're taking fixes for > arches to Fedora package, there are s390 fixes in Fedora for instance. No, I wasn't forget - I just gave up to get any feedback from you on these two issues: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/513743 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/578892 In fact I do got a feedback from you on the first one - you closed it as "FIXED UPSTREAM" which was absolutely unacceptable because this issue still wasn't fixed. So I reopened it with little hope that someone will apply the attached patch. Unfortunately even this simple issue was closed automatically with next Fedora release. I also cloned this ticket for F-12 (see next ticket) because it is also affected and don't see any feedback at all. This funny story clearly shows that we need to be able to fix issues w/o asking a permissions from MoFo. Like we did with the rest of Fedora stuff. I really feel somewhat uncomfortably because I'm explaining obvious things in front of wide and clever audience here. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
