Re: Need proventester karma for firstboot-1.113-4.fc14 (was: Re: bodhi v0.7.9 deployed)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Laska wrote:
> In retrospect, if the three updates you list were in fact
> interdependent, should they have been submitted and tested as a group to
> avoid the current situation?

Yes, of course. But it's not my fault that cwickert filed those 2 updates 
without the required matching firstboot update.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux