Re: x86_64 as Fedora's primary platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 23:00:45 +0200,
>  drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The x86_64 vs. i686 thing aside ... IMO the CD size limit does more
>> harm than good and should have been lifted a while ago.
>
> The CD size limit is self imposed by the Spins that choose to do so.

My point was that "but it does not fit on a CD" is a moot point.

> The 4 GiB size limit is a Spins SIG rule, that all published spins are
> supposed to adhere to.

Which is fine for now.

> Desktop considered using around a 1 GB target for F13, but in the end decided
> to stick with being CD sized.

Yeah I know.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux