On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 23 September 2010 08:37, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Well this cycle there was "on the way to gnome3 and back" situation, >> which caused a lot of churn (even upstream). > > For what it's worth, the GNOME "will we, won't we" on a few different > issues (GApplication, GTK3, etc) has cost a lot of developer time, and > from an upstream perspective was a royal pain in the behind. That's what I meant with "even upstream". > I think > Matthias has done a wonderful job keeping F14 in some sort of > semblance, even with all this upstream turmoil. No disagreement here. > I think 2.32 is going to be a pretty good, stable release, but a lot > of people (myself included) are saving the new bells and whistles for > GNOME 3.0. Expect the Fedora 15 feature page for GNOME to read a > little more interesting, for sure. Neither here ;) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
