Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 09:59:51 -0400,
  Al Dunsmuir <al.dunsmuir@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> If   a  second  rawhide-specific  staging  repository  (equivalent  to
> updates-testing,  so  call  it  rawhide-testing)  was  added with some
> autoqa  automation  to  prevent  gratuitous  problems  (such as broken
> dependencies  in  core  components),  I  suspect  the  situation would
> improve.

That is what branched releases have. Running one of these still gets you
pretty up to date stuff, but a bit more protection from breakage.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux