On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:22:45PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 10:13 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> > Jesse Keating wrote: >> > > It isn't going to be perfect, but it'll definitely be better than what >> > > we have now. >> > >> > I'm still not going to use rawhide. There would have to be a kernel >> > without debugging before I would even think of using it for my home or >> > work systems. I have a need for speed. :P >> >> I've honestly never noticed the difference between a debug and a >> non-debug kernel. >> >> I guess I spend too much money on CPUs. Or don't work 'em hard >> enough. :P > > I've not noticed it either, and that is with running Rawhide on my two > most-used systems. And I'm not exactly using leading-edge hardware > either. You both don't use GPUs are lot aren't you? ;) While working on gnome-shell we noticed a ~30-40% performance drop by running a debugging kernel compared to a non debug build (on both intel and radeon). -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
