Re: Fedora "backports" repo? (Was Re: PostgreSQL 9 for F14?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/22/2010 05:06 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Well "use rawhide" for anything else than testing and/or developing
> the new release just do not fly.
> 
> Some of the reasons I can think of:
> 
> 1) To high rate of changes / breakage

Not much one can do on this one, other than choose when to apply their
updates.

> 2) No signed packages

We will be fixing that, so that anything that falls out of koji will get
signed (except scratch builds)

> 3) Slower kernel

Not much I can do about that.

> 4) To much of "manual fixing" required
> 5) To many broken deps, which might prevent applying updates and security fixes
> 6) Some others that I can't think of right now might be a consequence
> of the above or something else

I think those can be addressed by placing an AutoQA filter between a
build from master and the build showing up in rawhide.

> 
> So please stop proposing rawhide for productive systems (or even
> database servers *shrug*).


- -- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyagM0ACgkQ4v2HLvE71NUmWwCgxETatIEx39lknPjpOMk1aIFH
LFMAni7OnWZD/TigvHv2dnEqkXJoqiYE
=Y1mY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux