On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jon Masters <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 18:09 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: >> That's a good point, but I would hope that someone elected to serve on a >> body in Fedora would actually *want* to vote, and the measures above are >> just ideas meant to be motivation/reminder than "forcing." > > Right. I'm not saying Jarod should issue Fedora Arrest Warrants (FAWs?) > for the members of FESCo (or the Board), but there should be an official > means by which votes can be counted in absentia, and in some cases it > may be required that everyone has to vote, and that's a good thing. > > btw, I think Kyle said earlier he's standing aside. So does that mean > there now is a new FESCo election? No, FESCo has policies in place to deal with this situation described here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FESCo_election_policy John -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
