On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:48:13 -0400 Máirín Duffy <duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi FESCo members, ...snip... > Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted, > even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, systemd could easily > have enough votes for inclusion in F14. I have a couple of questions > for you, FESCo, since I honestly don't know and maybe would feel more > comfortable knowing: ok. > - Has there been any consideration for formalizing the acceptable of > absentee votes? no, but perhaps there should be? > - How many members must be present at a meeting for a voting decision > to be considered valid? My understanding: A quorum (ie, 5 of 9). > - Is it possible to collect the votes of the folks who were not > present? yes. And I filed a ticket last week to do so: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/461 I'm pretty bummed that only 3 fesco members bothered to vote there. > Let me make one thing clear: if FESCo decides that this is the best > decision in the interest of Fedora, I trust you all completely to make > the right call. I am just coming away with the feeling that this is a > little closer to a dice roll - depending on who & how many showed up - > than I feel is really fair given the magnitude of the issue. This > decision while pending has come up as a topic time and time again in > Board meetings & community Q&A so it seems a major issue for a lot of > folks in Fedora. Therefore, I feel it should be something FESCo is > quite sure about. I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard. Any ideas? I could try making the tickets have some more descriptive subject like "HEY VOTE ON THIS PLEASE BEFORE NEXT MEETING:" or something. > Again, either way the decision goes - fine. It would be nice to hear > from the FESCo members not present on how they feel about the > decision, though. I'd love to too. > Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting > process, irregardless of its conclusion? Sure. I wish it was more clear cut too. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
