Hi FESCo members, On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:01 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > =================================== > #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-09-14) > =================================== > > Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-09-14/fesco.2010-09-14-19.30.log.html > > Meeting summary > --------------- > * init process (nirik, 19:30:01) > * pjones and ajax are traveling today, will not be able to attend. > (nirik, 19:30:30) Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted, even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, systemd could easily have enough votes for inclusion in F14. I have a couple of questions for you, FESCo, since I honestly don't know and maybe would feel more comfortable knowing: - Has there been any consideration for formalizing the acceptable of absentee votes? - How many members must be present at a meeting for a voting decision to be considered valid? - Is it possible to collect the votes of the folks who were not present? Let me make one thing clear: if FESCo decides that this is the best decision in the interest of Fedora, I trust you all completely to make the right call. I am just coming away with the feeling that this is a little closer to a dice roll - depending on who & how many showed up - than I feel is really fair given the magnitude of the issue. This decision while pending has come up as a topic time and time again in Board meetings & community Q&A so it seems a major issue for a lot of folks in Fedora. Therefore, I feel it should be something FESCo is quite sure about. Again, either way the decision goes - fine. It would be nice to hear from the FESCo members not present on how they feel about the decision, though. Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process, irregardless of its conclusion? ~m -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
