Máirín Duffy (duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted, > even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, systemd could easily have > enough votes for inclusion in F14. I have a couple of questions for you, > FESCo, since I honestly don't know and maybe would feel more comfortable > knowing: > > - Has there been any consideration for formalizing the acceptable of > absentee votes? We have accepted absentee votes either sent to the FESCo list or noted in the ticket before the meeting; in fact, noting votes in meeting item tickets is the de-facto method of participating for members who can't make it. > - How many members must be present at a meeting for a voting decision to > be considered valid? 5 out of 9 is considered quorum for the meeting, and 5 out of 9 is also required for decisions. > - Is it possible to collect the votes of the folks who were not present? We could poll them. But the ticket has been open for ~1 week for them to note their opinion; none of the not-present FESCo members have commented to this point. > Again, either way the decision goes - fine. It would be nice to hear > from the FESCo members not present on how they feel about the decision, > though. > > Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process, > irregardless of its conclusion? I said as much during the meeting. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
