On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 12:13:04PM -0400, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > >> > I don't think that's fair at all. Fedora is unique in a lot of ways, > >> > and a waterfall of updates isn't essential to that uniqueness. > >> List those ways please, aside from the relationship with Red Hat/CentOS. > > Why brush that aside? > Because it is very obvious, and it also subjective as a pro or con. But being obvious doesn't disqualify it -- it makes it, well, more obvious. And the question isn't about pro or cons, it's about uniqueness. > I would like to point out how nuanced and somewhat subjective the > differences you stated are, even if I may agree with most of them. Not counting that big one, maybe. :) But part of my point is: we don't need to be dramatic about distinguishing ourselves from Ubuntu just for the sake of doing that. I think there's room for both even with significant overlap in mission. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
