Re: rawhide rocks! [was Re: fedora mission (was Re: systemd and changes)]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Miller píše v Po 30. 08. 2010 v 18:56 -0400: 
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:11:06PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > A typical developer wants the dependencies of the software they are
> > working on to be _very_ up to date - probably not the upstream
> > development version, but the upstream maintenance version with _all_
> > current bug fixes.  Waiting 6 months for a bug fix does not make sense -
> > at that point the developer would be tempted to build the new version
> > locally.
> [...]
> > Saying "use rawhide" is not helpful, because rawhide is very often
> > broken. 
> 
> I've been running rawhide as my primary desktop OS at work for a couple of
> years now. During that time, it's only broken so as to cause me as much as a
> couple of hours work twice. That seems like a small price to pay for being
> on the extreme leading edge as you describe.
Curious.  My experience from using the latest Fedora (often updating on
the date of GA release) is very similar.

I sometimes wonder what the other users of Fedora are doing that the
"updates firehose" is such a problem...


> > A "stable" release that breaks a specific component for a few
> > days is acceptable - if this is not a component one uses for
> > development, it doesn't matter; if this is such a component, one knows
> > about it well enough to be able to revert an update or to contribute a
> > fix.
> 
> There you go! That's what we have in Rawhide.
No, for rawhide to really be useful, it must be possible to put
unfinished system-wide changes in there: it would be pretty much
impossible to integrate systemd into the distribution on a "branch", and
to add it into rawhide only after everything works 100%.  rawhide is
here to allow integration of "80% working but not finished" code, and
polishing it.  As such, it is unavoidably dangerous, even if it may
often work out fine.

What I was talking about originally is not "80% working but not
finished", but "as far as we know 100% working, but not tested by a
RHEL-equivalent QA process including two beta releases over 6 months".
Mirek

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux