Re: systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:49 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > I think that's precisely the concern.  In the event that F14 goes back
> > to upstart, the final release will use a configuration that may not have
> > received much testing.
> 
> Don't Do That Then. :-) It's just another reason to stick with systemd.

That's no answer.  As for any feature, we need a contingency plan in
case a problem is discovered that cannot be fixed in time.  At least, I
believe FESCo accepted the systemd feature with the understanding that
it could be rolled back if necessary.

-- 
Matt

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux