On Tue, 24.08.10 10:37, Matthew Miller (mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:32:03PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > So, I'm honestly asking: what are the odds that these few things are the > > > only improvements that cause a disruptive change to user interaction? I > > > don't think it's unreasonable to wonder if there are other changes which > > > fit this category. > > My concern with this line of thinking is that you're asking us to quantify > > the unknown unknown, and define a time period of testing which is > > 'long enough' for us to catch all the unknown unknowns. This seems > > impractical, in as much as it doesn't give us any clear criteria to define > > success with. > > I guess what I'm getting at is that we need careful end-user release note > documentation at the alpha testing stage showing what's known by the > developers to have a new interface or semantics. Some of that is in the FAQ > (How do I change a runlevel? Turns out, by "isolating" a target which > defines that runlevel.) but some of it is not -- things like "noauto now > means auto" should have been in there. And a FAQ format is not exactly > what's needed. Note that the telinit command is supported, too, by systemd. (as is "init" as an alias for this). Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
