On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 05:19:59PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > So, to turn this around. Do you think this behaviour is problematic? Can > you make a good case for dropping this automatism? If so I'd be willing > to do so. I guess sshfs fuse entries might be problematic, because they can require user input for the password. Also I guess it will interfer with the "user" option, because how should systemd be able to know which user should be allowed to umount the filesystem again? And in general I think that the "noauto" option should not just be ignored, e.g. in case a filesystem is umounted for safety reasons to not easily modify it accidently. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgp39LnMNFLEI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
