On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Martin Sourada wrote: >> I still remember the epic fail of having KDE 4.0 in stable fedora > > * I still think the KDE 4.0.3 we shipped in F9 wasn't that bad. We fixed all > the showstoppers before F9 was released, and were also quick to ship updates > fixing more annoyances, including updates to later 4.0.x releases. Yes, I > used F9 with 4.0.x myself, one one machine. Wow, you actually used F9 yourself (on one machine)? What an accomplishment. > * KDE 4.0 wasn't an update at all! It was what was shipped with a NEW > release. We intentionally DID NOT update F8 to KDE 4.x. Not 4.0, not 4.1, > not ever. This kind of changes is exactly what we have releases for and why > rolling release models are not usable for production. > * Version updates, the very ones you complain about, brought that 4.0 up to > 4.1 and later 4.2. I used F9 on my main machine from F8's EOL up to F9's > EOL. F9 with KDE 4.2 (and IMHO even 4.1) was rock solid, actually one of the > stablest Fedoras I used. (For example, F10 had issues with my hardware's > ALSA driver affecting PulseAudio, F11 with the graphics driver.) Are you seriously trying to say that you updated your own machine to Fedora 9 (KDE 4) 7 (!) months after it was rolled out? I have no words. Good work using everybody else as your test subjects: when they have ironed out all the bugs, you finally update your own computer. M.T. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
