Re: The slip down memory lane

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 16:11 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:

> On the data side, it would be very interesting to go back to each one of
> those slips and identify the component(s) that caused the slip and then
> question the individuals behind them to find out what happened.  Then
> take that information (share it with the list ?) and see what can be
> concluded (as a group ?)

This would be incomplete data.

For instance, the bug we decided to slip Alpha for was the 'basic video
driver' menu entry in the installer not working. But that's not
necessarily the entire cause of the slip. If the entire release process
had run on time, and we'd had really testable candidate images earlier
than we did, it's entirely possible this bug would have been identified
and fixed in time for the Alpha to be shipped.

Just looking at the specific bugs that end up blocking the release does
not give a complete picture of why the release slipped.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux