Re: "Staying close to upstream"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:51:40PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> * This policy of sticking religiously to upstream means we are not shipping 
> KDE integration for Firefox, despite patches from openSUSE existing. This 
> makes Firefox suck under KDE. Our Firefox maintainers refuse to do anything 
> about it.

If it's not good enough for upstream, why is it good enough for us? 
Who's committing to maintaining these patches? What's their turnaround 
speed if a security issue forces an update tht breaks them?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux