Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 11:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > >> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
> > >
> > >  I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to
> > > python2.7 failed because of "rhpl" package. rhpl was removed from Fedora
> > > some time ago, so it wasn't rebuild lately.
> > >  Now the question: what package should cause rhpl to be removed during update?
> > > Is there any obsoletes or conflicts that should cause rhpl to be removed
> > > during upgrades (F11→F15 time frame)?
> > 
> > I noticed this the other day as well. It should have been obsoleted by
> > something so that it was removed on upgrade.
> > 
> We've talked about adding Obsoletes for packages that are no longer in the
> repository with no replacement (as is the case for rhpl) to something like
> fedora-release before but AFAIK we've never pulled the trigger on actually
> doing it.
> 


I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a
problem with it.

maybe even the package was named package-swift

http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/package-swift.spec

-sv


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux