On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 11:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > >> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7 > > > > > > I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to > > > python2.7 failed because of "rhpl" package. rhpl was removed from Fedora > > > some time ago, so it wasn't rebuild lately. > > > Now the question: what package should cause rhpl to be removed during update? > > > Is there any obsoletes or conflicts that should cause rhpl to be removed > > > during upgrades (F11→F15 time frame)? > > > > I noticed this the other day as well. It should have been obsoleted by > > something so that it was removed on upgrade. > > > We've talked about adding Obsoletes for packages that are no longer in the > repository with no replacement (as is the case for rhpl) to something like > fedora-release before but AFAIK we've never pulled the trigger on actually > doing it. > I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a problem with it. maybe even the package was named package-swift http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/package-swift.spec -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
