On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > >> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7 > > > > I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to > > python2.7 failed because of "rhpl" package. rhpl was removed from Fedora > > some time ago, so it wasn't rebuild lately. > > Now the question: what package should cause rhpl to be removed during update? > > Is there any obsoletes or conflicts that should cause rhpl to be removed > > during upgrades (F11→F15 time frame)? > > I noticed this the other day as well. It should have been obsoleted by > something so that it was removed on upgrade. > We've talked about adding Obsoletes for packages that are no longer in the repository with no replacement (as is the case for rhpl) to something like fedora-release before but AFAIK we've never pulled the trigger on actually doing it. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp9LZRpPeFYu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
