On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 10:04 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > question is why the package name is jack-audio-connection-kit? As far >> > as I know the package name should be derived from the main tarball >> > name. >> > >> >> I thought about doing that once. Jack1's and jack2's source codes are >> distributed on the same website [1], We know that JACK stands for >> Jack-Audio-Connection-Kit. So there shouldn't be any confusion. >> > > "jack-audio-connection-kit" is the official name of the project and it > has been the suggested name for packages. Yes. Therefore I think we are safe from the guidelines' point of view: "When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came." from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#General_Naming Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
