Re: jack2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> question is why the package name is jack-audio-connection-kit? As far
>> as I know the package name should be derived from the main tarball
>> name.

> I thought about doing that once. Jack1's and jack2's source codes are
> distributed on the same website [1],  We know that JACK stands for
> Jack-Audio-Connection-Kit.  So there shouldn't be any confusion.

There is rule in Fedora
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#General_Naming

In our case it's a bit odd. However, I vote to call package in the
same way as main tarball.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux