Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alexander Boström (abo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > If I added inittab parsing support even when keeping "native breaks
> > legacy" around, then inittab would matter only if the default.target
> > symlink doesn't exist.

To go back to upstart, one of the reason upstart parses inittab for
the default runlevel is because it doesn't actually have a configuration
store for this elsewhere. So it's simplest to just use the legacy
config there.

> But I do think the %postinstall script, if it's an install and not an
> update, should check the contents of inittab and set the symlink
> accordingly. Otherwise an upgrade to a new release might make the system
> start X when it didn't do that before, which would be bad.

This part I agree with... we shouldn't be changing people's systems on
upgrade.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux