On 07/02/2010 07:37 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Ok, this policy was for the other case, a case when the maintainer > does not respond. I am not saying that it happens a lot, but it > happened in the past, and the syslog-ng case exposed in the thread is > another recent case. Maybe a policy is not needed and a case by > case handling by escalation to FESCo is enough, though. In my > days as a Fedora contributor, however, this issue was annoying > enough that I proposed the policy, maybe things have changed > now. A global view of package versions in rawhide vs the latest upstream similar to http://wiki.debian.org/DEHS would be useful to know how we stand. Rakesh Pandit was looking into this earlier. Not sure of the status on that now. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
