On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:21:06 +0200 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The page "Package Change Requests for existing packages" is unclear: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages > > Please expand on what "explanatory text" you want in addition to the > "Package Change Request" template. If there is a branch request, > e.g. for a released dist version, is it necessary to transcribe the > filled out template into a full sentence? Well, I'm not sure how to rephrase that... Basically we want to know if there are any non standard conditions to look at, ie: - You are not the owner and want to maintain in epel. Did you contact the fedora owner and wait and/or hear back that they didn't want to maintain it? - Is the package a dead package you are bringing back? etc. You don't need to add additional text for normal vanilla regular requests. It just saves cvsadmins the time to ask you what you want. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
