2010/7/1 Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:10:11 -0500, > Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Another wrinkle here is both libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo existing in >> rawhide/repo. Shouldn't libjpeg get removed now? Doing so should help >> matters too. > > If someone looks at that, they might also want to look at dropping 'man' > which is in a similar situation (obsoleted, but still hanging around). > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > libjpeg should be removed before mass-rebuild, because libjpeg-turbo provides: libjpeg-6b-47, the current libjpeg in the repo provides libjpeg-6b-46. I think there are no perfect solution for renaming/splitting packages, we should fix those broken dependencies finally instead of staying on workaround. Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
