On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So this is a bug with yum not handling package obsoletes correctly when it processes the libjpeg.so.62 dep for graphviz?
2010/6/30 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:21:37 +0800, Chen wrote:It's weird, libjpeg is already obsoleted.
>
>> libjpeg is split into libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-utils, Obsoletes
>> libjpeg is already added to libjpeg-turbo-utils.
>
> root.log of
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2282066
> doesn't refer to libjpeg-turbo-utils at all, but just libjpeg *and*
> libjpeg-turbo.
> --
See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2040484
--
So this is a bug with yum not handling package obsoletes correctly when it processes the libjpeg.so.62 dep for graphviz?
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
