Re: libjpeg-turbo conflicts in rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:04:51 +0800, Chen wrote:

> 2010/6/30 Rich Mattes <richmattes@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel in
> > Rawhide [1].  I get a message in root.log that libjpeg-turbo-devel
> > obsoletes libjpeg-devel, so yum pulls in libjpeg-turbo-devel instead.
> > Unfortunately, when it pulls in dependencies for my other BuildRequires,
> > it's trying to pull in libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo, and I get a conflict
> > since they both provide libjpeg.so.62.0.0
> >
> > The only thing I can think of is that one of the packages I'm requiring
> > has an explicit dep on libjpeg (I'm about to investigate which).  For
> > the time being, is there any to work around this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rich
> >
> > [1]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2282066
> >
> > --
> 
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607554

Why doesn't  libjpeg-turbo  contain the proper Obsoletes for libjpeg?

Only libjpeg-turbo-devel does it correctly for libjpeg-devel and
libjpeg-static.

That's only half of the show. libjpeg-turbo is meant to replace libjpeg,
so it should obsolete it. And if it also added the "Provides", there
would be no need to rebuild dependencies, but considering that this is
Rawhide, okay if it doesn't add the "Provides".
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux