Re: -upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/6/4 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> The problem is that the mandatory functionality (SysV-style initscripts
> compliant to our guidelines) gets pushed to a subpackage to make room for
> the optional and completely unneccessary junk, and that in some cases yum
> prefers the nonstandard subpackages.
>
> Plus, he's also violating other guidelines, e.g. for this package:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=176308
> Version contains a SVN revision tag which MUST be in Release instead
> according to our guidelines. (Thanks to Chen Lei for pointing that out.)
> (And look at the mess that nonstandard versioning made to the bumping tool
> spot used, see the insane Release values it produced. We have versioning
> rules for a reason.)
>
>        Kevin Kofler
>
> --
I found that spot disable building static libs in his package two days
ago, but he reenable yesterday, I really don't know why.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=176341


Chen Lei
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux