2010/6/1 Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>: >> I've definately talked to quite a few of them (online and in person) over >> the years this has been going on. I even had a tor package made and >> submitted it, but Enrico and my package crossed paths and his was a day >> earlier, so his "personal" version instead of a "fedora" version got >> accepted: > > The reason I asked is that they might be more willing to yank the package > from the current maintainer if there is someone willing to step in and > fix things rather than having to orphan it. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel I'd like to see that fesco can assign some co-maintainers for tor and maybe some more packages from Enrico. Regardless of violating fedora package guideline, his package style is quite strance, e,g, He add noarch documention to tor main package, then leave tor binary into -core subpackage, he also add an useless upstart conf as an alternatives to initsrcipt, the package layout is very different with tor upstream and other packages in fedora. Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
