On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:41 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 05/17/2010 11:22 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > otherwise it remains at B2. > > > > Just because you manage to build a kernel, or even manage to boot a > > kernel, doesn't mean it really works. We really need all the testing > > that goes into a full Fedora release before we trust what is built > > from that, which is why my suggestion of building Fedora N+1 on Fedora N. > Yes of course = by "it succeeds" I meant passes regression tests etc. We don't by any means have enough programmed testing to be confident about this kind of status for more than milestone releases at present. Given that, it certainly seems much safer to just build F(N+1) on F(N), as proposed earlier. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
