On 15 May 2010 22:13, Till Maas wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:29:37PM +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote: >> On 15 May 2010 21:07, Till Maas wrote: > >> > The upstream release monitoring tool (formerly fever) is not really used >> > to identify such packages, because there is no process to identify >> > non-uptodate packages like there is a process to identify old FTBS-bugs. >> > >> >> Yes, and I think it is time to draft a proposal for same. Remember >> Seth also had a script (which he ran quite recently to figure our >> concerned packages). > > A current problem I see with using upstream release monitoring is that > there is no easy way to query which bugs are ignored, because it is > perfectly valid to not touch the bug as a maintainer but only update the > package. This will avoid a new bug to be filed, but the maintainer will > still be notified with a new comment. > Yeah. Between thanks for your nice work on upstream release monitoring. -- Rakesh Pandit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rakesh freedom, friends, features, first -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
