On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:19:50AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:26:53PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > What we have is the orphaning (a proactive process) and awol > > maintainer processes (a reactive process).. we don't have an automated > > process that helps us identify potentially unmaintained packages to be > > concerned about. > > Well, we do have two more: fever which sends emails when packages have > newer upstream releases, and my own FTBFS runs (which I stopped for > F13 after it branched; I'll restart that for rawhide when F13 is > released). The upstream release monitoring tool (formerly fever) is not really used to identify such packages, because there is no process to identify non-uptodate packages like there is a process to identify old FTBS-bugs. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpzqplg66uQ7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
