Adam Williamson said the following on 05/13/2010 11:26 AM Pacific Time: > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 02:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 05/13/2010 02:37 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> There was an open ticket requesting Pino. There was not anything from >>> the maintainers requesting the games. >>> >> >> I did mention this on IRC but what is the criteria for pulling in the >> updates? If I knew what would be reasonable to request, it would help >> for future releases. I am also looking for guidelines on, what updates >> are considered a good thing. Is the game update a problem? > > The problem is there aren't really criteria, it's a very squishy thing. > We usually take at least one not-strictly-a-blocker fix during the RC > phase of a release, based on a sort of instinctive judgement call that > gets kicked around between QA and rel-eng. > > It's really really hard to codify this, because there's just so many > parameters. We did a decent job, I think, of codifying the issues that > can really block a release, but the risk vs. benefit calculation > involved in 'should we take this fix for this spin' is a massively more > difficult thing to codify :/ > > if someone wants to try that would be awesome, but honestly I wouldn't > know where to start. I'm up for the challenge.... previously having been told it wasn't possible for release criteria and blocker bugs ;-) John -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
