Jesse Keating said the following on 05/10/2010 04:08 PM Pacific Time: > Fedora 13 has released Release Candidate stage. We have reached a state > where the known blockers were fixed and were able to make a release > candidate. This happened last Thursday, and almost immediately we found > a need to spin a second release candidate. From this point on, only > items critical to the release will be tagged into the branched Fedora 13 > repo. > > I'm currently doing the first push of Fedora 13 stable updates. These > will be what we call "0-day" updates, that is updates available at > release time. Things in the bodhi update system for Fedora 13 can now > be pushed "stable" to this updates repo. This allows our maintainers to > continue to improve Fedora 13 as release engineering and QA finalize the > release bits. > > If you have a bug that you think is critical to the release of Fedora 13 > and must be fixed on the media, please make your bug block "F13Blocker". > We will be reviewing the contents of this blocker bug frequently > throughout the days as we near our go / no go decision. > I've noticed some discussion on #fedora-devel about "taking in nice-to-haves since the release is slipping." If these new packages are not blockers or critical to the release when/where did we decide to deviate from what is stated above? Who decides what gets in and what is the criteria? Better yet, is this written down anywhere? John -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
