2010/5/8 Matěj Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Of course, this kind of development process doesn’t produce distro > stable enough I could put it on my company’s server (or my mom’s > notebook), but it could be an ideal distro for developers or > contributors of any kind I am a developer and i want my workstation more stable than my mother laptop (and yes we both use Fedora). Indeed my home deploy server has F-11, my daily eclipse workstation has F-12, and i have rawhide in a kvm to do package maintenance. I dont want to be thrown daily updates on the first two, but i think 8-9 month is a good enough compromise for an upgrade; so i',m pretty comfortable with Fedora release cycle. Even if you don't develop for work, lets say you are contributing to some oss project, i don't think working on an "adventurous" environment is a good idea; do you want to be stopped for bugs in libraries your code base depends on? So, such an environment turns useful for distro developers, but a distro for distro developers sounds so silly to me. On the other hand, i have my living room htpc with fedora and update-candidates turned on (and atrpms-bleeding to be precise). So i get all those updates daily, hoping some of the (very minor in comparison to those i *could* have on my work pc) issues go away. I have choice; and no, i'm not configuring all like that because fesco told me. I understand and respect any different opinion, but please don't imply i don't exists, because i think i am a pretty standard figure in end-user realm. Cheers -- Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli@xxxxxxxxx> Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA) Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18) Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337 DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278 Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/guidograzioli -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
