Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > The problem with the NTP project is that the development is closed. > Even the most trivial bugs take a lot of effort to fix. It's possible > to pay them to be a NTP forum member and increase the chances of them > accepting the patches, but that's not what I'd call an open > development. > > Also, we are carrying an intrusive (and not very easy to port) patch > that was rejected -- the power saving patch. I have to admit I was > hoping I could drop it one day if chrony was the default client. There was a "super accurate timing" thread a few days ago. Certainly much newer than the alternatives, so I suppose it is also more "immature". Still interesting, though. -- Roberto Ragusa mail at robertoragusa.it -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
