2010/5/6 Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:39:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Mail Lists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > On 05/05/2010 09:35 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: >> >> With the latest improvements in the chrony package related to >> >> NetworkManager and name resolving I think it is now good enough to >> >> replace ntpd in the default configuration and the configurations >> >> supported by system-config-date. >> >> > I think this is a terrible idea. >> >> Yes. I certainly wouldn't use it, and especially object to the proposed >> strong-arm tactics of eliminating all configuration support for ntpd. >> The case for making chrony default is weak enough, and the case for >> throwing roadblocks in the way of people who prefer ntpd is nonexistent. > > I'm not suggesting to remove the ntp support from s-c-d, just to add a > support for chrony and change the dependency to a name provided by > both packages and marking chrony as default in the comps. for the desktop/default/gnome spin... but not for the full dvd i hope. other than that having an option is a nice idea if it is less "expensive" on resources and enough for a certain group of users (desktop ones). removing support for ntpd would be a completly different deal. kind regards, Rudolf Kastl > > -- > Miroslav Lichvar > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
