On Thursday 06 May 2010 13:10:36 Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:39:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Mail Lists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On 05/05/2010 09:35 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > >> With the latest improvements in the chrony package related to > > >> NetworkManager and name resolving I think it is now good enough to > > >> replace ntpd in the default configuration and the configurations > > >> supported by system-config-date. > > >> > > > I think this is a terrible idea. > > > > Yes. I certainly wouldn't use it, and especially object to the proposed > > strong-arm tactics of eliminating all configuration support for ntpd. > > The case for making chrony default is weak enough, and the case for > > throwing roadblocks in the way of people who prefer ntpd is nonexistent. > > I'm not suggesting to remove the ntp support from s-c-d, just to add a > support for chrony and change the dependency to a name provided by > both packages and marking chrony as default in the comps. I think it would be better to drop ntp support completely from s-c-d once chrony becomes default in Fedora. We aim to support default Fedora configuration tools. Radek Novacek is now working on date/time DBus interface under FMCI umbrella. Jaroslav -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
