Am Fr, den 25.06.2004 schrieb Alexandre Oliva um 20:26: > On Jun 25, 2004, Aaron Bennett <aaron.bennett@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Sorry also for coming late to this thread, but I'd like to endorse > > kernel-devel as well. > > I'd like that too. There's no reason to keep headers around if I'm > not going to build modules, and don't *want* to accidentally build > modules. > It shouldn't contain full kernel sources, though (they're available > elsewhere), only whatever is needed to build kernel modules. I posted it elsewhere, but I think it got lost. Before we move in this direction can we please discuss if we use the method mentioned in http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0406.2/1280.html (patch 2/2) or something similar to what we are doing now, but split and installable in parallel for all kernels? Or telling me why the kbuild method is bogus could satisfy me also ;-) CU thl
