Re: No more kernel-source(code) ??? (was: rawhide report: 20040623 changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le ven 25/06/2004 Ã 14:25, Leonard den Ottolander a Ãcrit :
> Hello Matias,
> 
> > /boot/config-2.6.6-1.435-i586
> 
> > No conflict.
> 
> I would say the extra dash would break a lot of scripts. I am used to
> break of version/release at the second dash at the end. Not very nice to
> introduce inconsistency in this regard.
> 
> Also, wouldn't kernel-2.6.6-1.435-i686 be considered newer than
> kernel-2.6.6-1.435-i586?
> 

I am not clear. I am not talking about version-release of rpm.
Current rpm name/version/release can stay in place :
Paquet : kernel-2.6.6-1.435.i586.rpm : uname -r : 2.6.6-1.435-i586
Paquet : kernel-2.6.6-1.435.i685.rpm : uname -r : 2.6.6-1.435-i686

Now you can install kernel-2.6.6-1.435.i586.rpm and
kernel-2.6.6-1.435.i685.rpm (perhaps with "rpm -i --nodeps" but it's not
a problem for kernel developers).

> Leonard.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux