On Jun 24, 2004, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 13:03 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Jun 24, 2004, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > SMP modules are different from the non-SMP ones, but that's not a >> > problem as you can install kernel-smp in parallel with your main kernel >> > package. The i586 vs i686 part is the hard one. >> >> Not hard at all. Just add i586 to the kernel version number >> somewhere, and it will be a different pathname just like smp. > Yes, but that's ugly to look at :-) So what? smp is ugly too, but it's there because it's useful. It fixes a real problem, and it doesn't hurt much, so... -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
