On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 22:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:35:09 -0700, Jesse wrote: > > > >> I wonder if there's something about the commit message which > > >> caused the report to chop it off? > > > > > > No, it's a [fixed] bug in repodiff, which ignores %changelog entries > > > added > > > on the same day as the latest entries found in the previous release > > > of the > > > package. > > > > > > The sys-admins would need to upgrade repodiff, createrepo, and > > > dependencies, to those versions that fix this. It's related to Yum > > > upstream tickets #6 and #7. > > > > > > > This report is generated in a chroot of rawhide, so if those fixed > > builds are in rawhide than they will be used. > > > > -- > > Jes > > Well, then somebody should reopen http://yum.baseurl.org/ticket/7 > and ask for applying the fix to repodiff. It's included in the patch I > added to the ticket more than a year ago (the timestamp comparison fix to > cover changes added on the same day). Sorry for that, I thought I'd fixed it when I closed it! Anyway, just built a new yum-utils HEAD (which includes the repodiff fix) in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2115503 -- James Antill - james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.27 http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
