On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:35:09 -0700, Jesse wrote: > >> I wonder if there's something about the commit message which > >> caused the report to chop it off? > > > > No, it's a [fixed] bug in repodiff, which ignores %changelog entries > > added > > on the same day as the latest entries found in the previous release > > of the > > package. > > > > The sys-admins would need to upgrade repodiff, createrepo, and > > dependencies, to those versions that fix this. It's related to Yum > > upstream tickets #6 and #7. > > > > This report is generated in a chroot of rawhide, so if those fixed > builds are in rawhide than they will be used. > > -- > Jes Well, then somebody should reopen http://yum.baseurl.org/ticket/7 and ask for applying the fix to repodiff. It's included in the patch I added to the ticket more than a year ago (the timestamp comparison fix to cover changes added on the same day). -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
