Re: potentially unmaintained packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:38:03AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 13.04.2010, 17:03 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal:
> 
> > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/potentially-unmaintained/2010-04-13/
> 
> I see packages_by_user, pkgs_with_bugs and everything. What I would like
> to see is pkgs_with_bugs_by_user, because this is something that should
> really considered harmful. If a package has no bugs, I don't think it
> needs a new build.
> 
Reading this made me think that this would be a great thing to expose
continuously, for instance on this packagedb page:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/toshio

Querying bugzilla is a comparatively expensive process so it's probably
something we need to do by syncing the count of bugs into the db via a cron
job.  Any takers?

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpESc4Tz3Kw3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux