On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 01:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I would suggest proposing those changes you have in mind to dkl, There > is a internal bugzilla list. The problem is this isn't an area where I can be terribly constructive; I can point at the problem but I've nothing to offer in the way of a solution, as I'm not a coder, nor a Bugzilla architect. I can draw pie-in-the-sky pictures of Teh Awesome Bugtracking System, if you like, but I've no real idea how they map to the realities of what's achievable within the constraints of Bugzilla. Remember RH now has a policy of diverging as little as possible from upstream Bugzilla, so any changes we wanted to make would need to be something that upstream would accept, we can't do significant modifications of Bugzilla purely in the RH instance. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
