Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/31/2010 01:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 14:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>> As a user, having been hit by a bug, "CLOSED UPSTREAM" is nothing but a
>> cheap bold lie packagers use as weak excuse to for not being able to fix
>> a bug having hit a user.
>>
>> In other words: "FIXED UPSTREAM" does not fix anything for the user
>> struggling with a bug. It only helps the packager to keep his bug
>> statistics clean.
>>
>> Analogous considerations apply to "FIXED RAWHIDE"
>
> It's CLOSED UPSTREAM and CLOSED RAWHIDE, not FIXED UPSTREAM and FIXED
> RAWHIDE. CLOSED does not, necessarily, mean FIXED.
Then let me put it more bluntly: To a Fedora release's user, both tags 
are a slap into the face of "reporter" and mean "your bug will not be 
fixed".


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux