Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/31/2010 02:28 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/31/2010 05:50 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>    
>> On 03/31/2010 11:32 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>      
>>> On 03/31/2010 02:55 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>        
>>>>
>>>> If your "unworthy bug" doesn't cause malfunctions, you could easily
>>>> close it "WONTFIX" and add a comment.
>>>>          
>>> Why do you advocate WONTFIX over FIXED RAWHIDE?
>>>        
>> Because it is how s user perceives it.
>>      
> I don't think engaging in mind reading on behalf of users is a good
> argument.  I fixed it in Rawhide and I believe informing the user is
> important.
Well this is what I call "cheating the user" and "maintainer lying at 
themselves about their package's state" and why I consider "FIXED 
RAWHIDE" to be non-helpful.

The maintainer did not fix the bug a "reporter" filed, but left it 
unresolved and fixed another bug: Another incarnation of the same bug 
waiting to hit the users in the next release.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux